Delivering Equitable and Meaningful Community Benefits via Clean Hydrogen Hubs


Large industrial projects involve complex stakeholder engagements and thorough evaluation of technical, financial, environmental, and social aspects. The regional H2Hub applicants that have been selected are now in the process of award negotiation. Although the hubs moving forward in the process are not expected to receive any funding until these negotiations are completed, they can receive up to $20 million for the detailed planning phase (i.e., Phase 1). The initial phase should take 12 to 18 months, during which broader community engagement should begin in earnest. By the time Phase 1 is complete, applicants should have laid the groundwork to eventually negotiate and sign some type of agreement with the local community.

From the lessons presented in this brief, both communities and developers can form processes for better engagement, not only for the regional hubs but also for other large industrial developments. An understanding of benefits that are typically requested by communities will be helpful to companies hoping to take advantage of funding through current and future DOE FOAs, especially if they can be tied to any of the eight Justice40 policy priorities (see Exhibit 5). These benefits typically fall into one of two categories: (1) community assistance funding above and beyond the project scope, and (2) requirements within the project scope to ensure benefits flow to specific groups (see Exhibit 13).

Requirements for CBPs and CBAs offer a gold standard for all developers to adopt. Looking forward, all key stakeholders will have a part to play as we continue to develop the technologies and industries to move to a clean energy economy.

Proactive communication with EJ and other community groups early in the project development process will help industry understand what production and use cases are more acceptable and adapt designs to lower the risk of project delays or cancellation. Industry should also consider maintaining transparency during scoping studies and clarifying how resources will be allocated. Early engagement with academia and labor representatives will help ensure the workforce development pipeline can train the needed number of highly skilled workers and that these workers can be attracted and retained by high-quality jobs.

OCED’s framework for community benefits provides guidance on how to approach successful community engagement in the United States. This and other relevant resources will be critical as clean energy and industrial projects grow to meet our climate goals. As federally funded projects simultaneously attract enthusiastic support and concerned opposition from various parties, maintaining accountability on stated CBP objectives, metrics, and CBA clauses will ultimately be vital to the success of these projects to show true climate and economic benefits for the long term.

As these projects mature, meaningful two-way community engagement can lead to mutually beneficial relationships between project developers and local communities and should be adopted as the standard operating procedure for all projects, not just for those hoping to receive federal funding.

Centering equity and community engagement in project design will be a critical lever for delivering a just clean energy transition in the United States.

[1] Arnout de Pee et al., “Decarbonization of industrial sectors: the next frontier,” McKinsey & Company, June 2018, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/sustainability/our%20insights/how%20industry%20can%20move%20toward%20a%20low%20carbon%20future/decarbonization-of-industrial-sectors-the-next-frontier.ashx.

[2] “U.S. National Clean Hydrogen Strategy and Roadmap,” U.S. Department of Energy, accessed December 19, 2023, https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/library/roadmaps-vision/clean-hydrogen-strategy-roadmap.

[3] Courtney Burgoin, et al., “Funding Our Future: Clean Hydrogen Hub Offers Major Opportunity — If We Do It Right,” RMI, May 17, 2022, https://rmi.org/clean-hydrogen-hub-offers-major-opportunity/; and John Coequyt, “Four Ways the Inflation Reduction Act Speeds the Shift to a Cleaner, More Affordable Energy Future,” RMI, August 16, 2022, https://rmi.org/four-ways-the-inflation-reduction-act-speeds-the-shift-to-a-cleaner-more-affordable-energy-future/.

[4] “Community Benefits Plans Overview,” U.S. Department of Energy, accessed December 19, 2023, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2023-08/OCED%20CBP%20101%20Factsheet.pdf.

[5] “Opportunity Zones,” U.S. Internal Revenue Service, accessed December 19, 2023, https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/businesses/opportunity-zones; and “Energy Community Tax Credit Bonus,” Interagency Working Group on Coal & Power Plant communities & Economic Revitalization, accessed December 19, 2023, https://energycommunities.gov/energy-community-tax-credit-bonus/.

[6] Paul Mohai, David Pellow, and J. Timmons Roberts, “Environmental Justice,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 (2009): 405-430, https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348.

[7] David J. X. Gonzalez et al., “Historic redlining and the siting of oil and gas wells in the United States,” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 33 (2023): 76-83, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00434-9.

[8] Lawrence Susskind et al., “Sources of opposition to renewable energy projects in the United States,” Energy Policy 165 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112922.

[9] “DE-FOA-0002936: Industrial Decarbonization and Emissions Reduction Demonstration-to-Deployment Funding Opportunity Announcement,” U.S. Department of Energy Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, accessed December 19, 2023, https://oced-exchange.energy.gov/Default.aspx#FoaId3d36f88c-0527-4539-b90b-41895ad5edb2.

[10] “PEAK Coalition Hydrogen Statement,” PEAK Coalition, accessed December 19, 2023, https://f1096961-3dc3-44e4-b248-f2d10eb29a01.usrfiles.com/ugd/f10969_94e733b1328d4168b74475313cddf9de.pdf; “Reclaiming Hydrogen for a Renewable Future: Distinguishing Oil & Gas Industry Spin from Zero-Emission Solutions,” EarthJustice, August 31, 2021, https://earthjustice.org/feature/green-hydrogen-renewable-zero-emission; and Tessa Weiss et al., “Hydrogen Reality Check: All ‘Clean Hydrogen’ Is Not Equally Clean,” RMI, October 4, 2022, https://rmi.org/all-clean-hydrogen-is-not-equally-clean/.

[11] “Justice40 Initiative Covered Programs List,” U.S. White House, August 18, 2022, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Justice40-Covered-Programs-List_v1.1_07-15-2022.pdf.

[12] Erik Kamrath and Pete Budden, “Success of Hydrogen Hubs Requires a Step Increase in Transparency,” NRDC, October 19, 2023, https://www.nrdc.org/bio/erik-kamrath/success-hydrogen-hubs-requires-step-increase-transparency.

[13] “Guidance for Creating a Community Benefits Plan for the Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs,” U.S. Department of Energy Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, October 2022, https://oced-exchange.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=9c024599-7d5c-4e84-9029-d307d7621ab7.

[14] “Guidance for Creating a Community Benefits Plan for Industrial Decarbonization and Emissions Reduction Demonstration-to-Deployment FOA,” U.S. Department of Energy Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, accessed December 19, 2023, https://oced-exchange.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=75c3e559-e4a9-45fb-bfcd-0140cea66aaf.

[15] “Community Benefits Plan Template,” U.S Department of Energy Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, accessed December 19, 2023, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ah5wyICkmEd8PQ21RkyvycPArBVFE3B-/edit.

[16] “Pathways to Commercial Liftoff: Overview of Societal Considerations and Impacts,” U.S. Department of Energy, March 2023, https://liftoff.energy.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/20230523-Pathways-to-Commercial-Liftoff-Overview-of-Societal-Considerations-Impact.pdf.

[17] “Energy Justice Mapping Tool – Disadvantaged Communities Reporter,” U.S. Department of Energy, last modified July 24, 2023, https://energyjustice.egs.anl.gov/; and “Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool,” Council on Environmental Quality, last modified November 22, 2022, https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/.

[18] “Additional Resources and Tools Related to EJScreen,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, accessed December 19, 2023, https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen/additional-resources-and-tools-related-ejscreen.

[19] Talia Lanckton and Subin DeVar, “Justice in 100 Metrics: Tools for Measuring Equity in 100% Renewable Energy Policy Implementation,” Initiative for Energy Justice, January 2021, https://iejusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Justice-in-100-Metrics-2021.pdf; and “Energy Equity Project Report: 2022,” University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability, 2022, https://energyequityproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/220174_EEP_Report_8302022.pdf.

[20] Lee Romney, “Community, Developers Agree on Staples Plan,” Los Angeles Times, May 31, 2001, https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-may-31-mn-4715-story.html ; Ralph Rosado, “The Role of Community Benefits Agreements in Increasing Equity and Inclusion,” Case Western Reserve University, 2005, in Mark L. Joseph and Amy T. Khare, eds., “What Works to Promote Inclusive, Equitable Mixed-Income Communities,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, https://case.edu/socialwork/nimc/sites/case.edu.nimc/files/2020-05/Rosado.WWV_.Role%20of%20Community%20Benefits%20Agreements%20in%20Equity%20and%20Inclusion.2020.pdf ; Leland Saito and Jonathan Truong, “The L.A. Live Community Benefits Agreement: Evaluating the Agreement Results and Shifting Political Power in the City.” Urban Affairs Review, 51(2), 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414527064 ; and Vicki Been, “Community Benefits Agreements: A New Local Government Tool or Another Variation on the Exactions Theme?” University of Chicago Law Review 77, 2010.

[21] Bruce Murphy, “Park East Removal Didn’t ‘Devastate’ Downtown,” Urban Milwaukee, 2023, August 14, 2023, https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2023/08/14/murphys-law-park-east-removal-didnt-devastate-downtown/ ; “Park East Corridor,” Department of City Development, City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2023, https://city.milwaukee.gov/DCD/Projects/ParkEastredevelopment ; William Ho, “Community Benefits Agreements: An Evolution in Public Benefits Negotiation Processes,” Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law Vol. 17, No. 1/2, Community Benefits Agreements (Fall 2007/Winter 2008), pp. 7-34 https://www.jstor.org/stable/25782802 ; “Amendment to the Regional Transportation Plan – 2020 Park East Freeway Corridor,” Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Waukesha, Wisconsin, February 2001, https://www.sewrpc.org/SEWRPCFiles/Publications/pr/2001-02_amendment_rtp_2020_park_east_freeway_corridor.pdf ; and “USDOT Ladders of Opportunity Every Place Counts Design Challenge; Case Study: Park East Freeway,” U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012, https://www.cnu.org/sites/default/files/Spokane%20Case%20Study%203%20-%20Milwaukee.pdf .

[22] Kelly Hessedal, “Construction starts on new East Village high rise,” CBS 8, April 17, 2015, https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/construction-starts-on-new-east-village-high-rise/509-1bef2a37-90ee-49b7-889c-d591d0493d01 ; Chris Jennewein, “Ballpark Village Hailed as Model Public-Private Development,” Times of San Diego, April 17, 2015, https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2015/04/17/ballpark-village-hailed-as-model-public-private-development/ ; Roger Showley, “Ballpark Village project is back: Developers propose $250M residential complex,” The San Diego Union Tribune, August 1, 2013, https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/growth-development/sdut-petco-ballpark-village-residential-jmi-lennar-2013aug01-htmlstory.html ; Jeanette Steele, “Blueprint for project won’t be discarded,” San Diego Union-Tribune, September 25, 2008, https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-1m25ballpark104951-blueprint-project-wont-be-disca-2008sep25-story.html ; Rob Davies, “Union Cries Foul on Ballpark Village,” Voices of San Diego, July 21, 2009, https://voiceofsandiego.org/2009/07/21/union-cries-foul-on-ballpark-village/ ; “Construction of workforce/affordable housing starts in downtown San Diego,” San Diego Housing Commission, City of San Diego, California, May 7, 2007, https://www.sdhc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/NewsRelease16thMarket.pdf; Evan McLaughlin, “Ballpark Village Passes After Affordable Housing Compromise,” Voices of San Diego, October 19, 2005, https://voiceofsandiego.org/2005/10/19/ballpark-village-passes-after-affordable-housing-compromise/; and Bendix Anderson, “Community Benefits: Work hasn’t started on the condos at Ballpark Village, but the affordable apartments developers promised to win approval are open,” Multi-Family Executive, March 1, 2009, https://www.multifamilyexecutive.com/design-development/community-benefits_o .

[23] Alannah Edwards, “Streetcar on BeltLine receives backlash from community,” The Southerner, February 14, 2023 https://thesoutherneronline.com/91327/news/streetcar-on-beltline-receives-backlash-from-community/; Dan Immergluck, “The road to hell is paved with successful urban planning projects—‘green gentrification’ is driving up housing costs and creating racial exclusion,” Fortune, January 25, 2023, https://fortune.com/2023/01/25/green-gentrification-atlanta-beltline-racial-exclusion-housing-costs/; “Atlanta BeltLine – Things to Do,” Discover Atlanta, Atlanta Convention & Visitors Bureau, 2023,https://discoveratlanta.com/things-to-do/outdoors/beltline/; “Keeping the Community Informed,” Atlanta Beltline Inc., 2023, https://beltline.org/the-project/planning-and-community-engagement/; Byrone E. Small, “Realities of Revitalization,” Atlanta Business Chronicle, July 29, 2021, https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2021/07/29/07-30-21-realities-of-revitalization.html; Jaclynn Ashly, “The Black residents fighting Atlanta to stay in their homes,” Al-Jazeera, November 30, 2020, https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2020/11/30/atlanta-gentrification; Jen Kinney, “Atlanta BeltLine Founder Resigns From Trail’s Board Over Equity Concerns,” Next City, September 17, 2017, https://nextcity.org/urbanist-news/atlanta-beltline-partnership-founder-resigns-equity; Emily Nonko, “Resetting the Atlanta BeltLine’s Focus on Equitable Development,” Next City, August 22, 2018, https://nextcity.org/urbanist-news/resetting-the-atlanta-beltlines-focus-on-equitable-development; Josh Green, “Atlanta Beltline housing prices spur downtown protest,” Curbed Atlanta, July 23 , 2018, https://atlanta.curbed.com/2018/7/23/17602764/atlanta-beltline-housing-prices-protest-gentrification; Willoughby Mariano, Lindsey Conway, and Anastaciah Ondieki, “How the Atlanta Beltline broke its promise on affordable housing,” The Atlanta Journal Constitution, July 13, 2017, https://www.ajc.com/news/local/how-the-atlanta-beltline-broke-its-promise-affordable-housing/0VXnu1BlYC0IbA9U4u2CEM//; Alex S. Cummings, “Is the Beltline Bad for Atlanta?” Tropics of Meta, April 9, 2012, https://tropicsofmeta.com/2012/04/09/is-the-beltline-bad-for-atlanta/; and “BeltLine Citizen Participation Framework (Ordinance 06-R-1576),” Atlanta City Council, 2006, https://beltlineorg.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Community-Engagement-Framework-Chart-with-Original-Framework-Highlighted_9.30.22.pdf.

[24] Jacqueline Hermer and Andrew Hedden, “Whose Streets? Gentrification in Seattle,” Intersections, Vol. 1: Issue 1, November, 2008, https://www.azinelibrary.org/approved/intersections-1.pdf; Ken Mochizuki, “Neighborhoods form coalition to voice concern over Dearborn development,” International Examiner, December 6, 2006, https://iexaminer.org/neighborhoods-form-coalition-to-voice-concern-over-dearborn-development/; and Kathy Mulady, “Central Seattle residents want delay on Target, Lowe’s proposal,” Seattlepi.com, November 29, 2006, https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/article/central-seattle-residents-want-delay-on-target-1221128.php.

[25] Diamy Wang, “Columbia students and Harlem residents protest gentrification,” The Daily Pennsylvanian, September 26, 2022, https://www.thedp.com/article/2022/09/columbia-gentrification-protest-harlem-ffp-uc-townhomes-penntrification; Erin Blakemore, “How Columbia’s Student Uprising of 1968 Was Sparked by a Segregated Gym,” The History Channel, July 7, 2020, https://www.history.com/news/columbia-university-protest-occupation-1968; Reina Patel, “Columbia is Trying to Make Manhattanville Construction Noise Bearable. Is it Working?” The Columbia Spectator, April 25, 2019, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/the-eye/2019/04/25/columbia-is-trying-to-make-manhattanville-construction-noise-bearable-is-it-working/; Emile Warot, “Ten years ago, Columbia pledged $76 million to local nonprofits. What happens when it runs out?” The Columbia Spectator, October 8, 2018, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/the-eye/2018/10/08/ten-years-ago-columbia-pledged-76-million-to-local-nonprofits-what-happens-when-it-runs-out/; Nathan Kensinger, “As Columbia University moves into Manhattanville, its industrial past is erased” Curbed NY, March 8, 2018, https://ny.curbed.com/2018/3/8/17095838/manhattanville-columbia-university-expansion-photo-essay; Juliana Kim, “Nine years later, just 1 percent of Columbia’s $10 million commitment to affordable housing has been spent,” The Columbia Spectator, February 13, 2018, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/the-eye/2018/02/13/nine-years-later-just-1-percent-of-columbias-10-million-commitment-to-affordable-housing-has-been-spent/; Josmar Trujillo, “Millions for Programs Sit in Bank Amid Youth Tensions in Harlem,” City Limits, November 13, 2015, https://citylimits.org/2015/11/13/millions-for-programs-sit-in-bank-amid-youth-tensions-in-harlem/; “Columbia’s West Harlem Expansion: A Look at the Issues,” Student Coalition on Expansion and Gentrification, Columbia University, January 2014, https://coalitionagainstgentrification.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/scegbookletshort-edge.pdf; Steven Gregory, “The Radiant University: Space, Urban Redevelopment, and the Public Good.” City and Society 25, 47-69, 2013 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Radiant-University%3A-Space%2C-Urban-Redevelopment%2C-Gregory/ceffc42c72e2ef1d03b6eed371e94add33ddb2f4; Jeff Mays, “Group Distributing Columbia Cash Did Nothing Illegal, Investigators Say,” DNA Info, December 19, 2012, https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20121219/west-harlem/group-distributing-columbia-cash-did-nothing-illegal-investigators-say/; Charles Bagli, “Court Upholds Columbia Campus Expansion Plan,” The New York Times, June 24, 2010, https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/nyregion/25columbia.html; Paul Schordt “Columbia Expansion 101: Wealthy University Devours West Harlem,” The Indypendent, August 31, 2007, https://indypendent.org/2007/08/columbia-expansion-101-wealthy-university-devours-west-harlem/; and Timothy Williams, “In West Harlem Land Dispute, It’s Columbia vs. Residents,” The New York Times, November 20, 2006, https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/20/nyregion/20columbia.html

[26] Nicole Lauren, “Exclusive: Miami Worldcenter phase one complete, developers break down what’s next,” CBS News, April 7, 2023, https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/exclusive-miami-worldcenter-phase-one-complete-developers-break-down-whats-next/ ; Deidra Funcheon, “Massive Miami Worldcenter project is more than halfway complete,” Axios, February 21, 2023, https://www.axios.com/local/miami/2023/02/21/miami-worldcenter-update-whats-open ; Lily Oppenheimer, “Worldcenter Developers Promised To Prioritize Overtown Jobs. Some Say They’re Not Doing Enough,” WLRN, February 8, 2019, https://www.wlrn.org/news/2019-06-09/worldcenter-developers-promised-to-prioritize-overtown-jobs-some-say-theyre-not-doing-enough ; “Synopsis of the Miami WorldCenter Economic Development Incentive Agreement,” Fact Sheet, Miami World Center, 2014, http://www.miamicra.com/seopwcra/docs/Marketing/Miami%20World%20Center%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf; Alayne Unterberger, “Who Benefits? An Analysis of The Miami WorldCenter “Economic Incentive Agreement”,” Research Institute on Social and Economic Policy (RISEP), Center for Labor Research and Studies, Florida International University, 2015, https://risep.fiu.edu/research-publications/equitable-urban-development/community-benefits-from-development/who-benefits-report-final50415.pdf; and Steve Litz, “Approval of Miami Worldcenter Met With Opposition,” NBC, July 14, 2015, https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/approval-of-miami-worldcenter-met-with-opposition/1962780/.

[27] Eric Gunn, “Will Brewers stadium project need a community benefits deal to fly?” Wisconsin Examiner, September 19, 2023, https://wisconsinexaminer.com/2023/09/19/will-brewers-stadium-project-need-a-community-benefits-deal-to-fly/; Tom Daykin, “Bucks submit entertainment center plans to city,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, November 16, 2016, https://www.jsonline.com/story/money/real-estate/commercial/2016/11/16/bucks-submit-entertainment-center-plans-city/93976664/; A.J. Bayatpour, “It’s bigger than basketball, but do benefits of new Bucks arena come at expense of other businesses?” Fox 6, January 13, 2016, https://www.fox6now.com/sports/its-bigger-than-basketball-but-do-benefits-of-new-bucks-arena-come-at-expense-of-other-businesses; Sean Ryan, “City help for Milwaukee Bucks development approved after community benefits debate,” Milwaukee Business Journal, July 2, 2015, https://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/blog/real_estate/2015/07/city-help-for-milwaukee-bucks-development-approved.html; and Alex Altman and Zeke Miller, “Scott Walker’s Bucks Arena Deal May Be a 2016 Misfire,” TIME, June 11, 2015, https://time.com/3918031/scott-walker-arena-milwaukee-bucks/.

[28] Anna Russell, “RWE Sells its Shares in Maine Offshore Wind Projects,” RWE, July 3, 2023, https://americas.rwe.com/press/2023-07-03-rwe-sells-its-shares-in-maine-offshore-wind-projects/; Tux Turkel, “Off the Maine coast, decade-delayed wind power project faces uncertain future,” Portland Press Herald, June 11, 2023, https://www.pressherald.com/2023/06/11/off-the-maine-coast-decade-delayed-wind-power-project-faces-uncertain-future/; Ella Nilsen, “The future of wind energy in the US is floating turbines as tall as 30 Rock,” CNN, May 19, 2023, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/19/us/floating-offshore-wind-energy-turbines-climate/index.html; Don Carrigan, “Lobstermen united against Monhegan offshore wind project,” News Center Maine, March 26, 2021, https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/life/lobstermen-united-against-monhegan-offshore-wind-project/97-a4d2385d-defa-42b1-94c4-974988477fda ;https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/life/lobstermen-united-against-monhegan-offshore-wind-project/97-a4d2385d-defa-42b1-94c4-974988477fda; Evan Houk, “New Developers of Monhegan Wind Project Aim for 2023 Deployment,” The Lincoln County News, August 25, 2020, https://lcnme.com/currentnews/new-developers-of-monhegan-wind-project-aim-for-2023-deployment/; Tux Turkel, “Regulators delay power contract essential to UMaine floating wind farm,” Portland Press Herald, January 9, 2018, https://www.pressherald.com/2018/01/09/puc-delays-approving-power-contract-essential-to-umaine-wind-project/; Travis Dow, “Oped: Wind energy project bad fit for Monhegan,” Island Institute, February 9, 2017, https://www.islandinstitute.org/working-waterfront/oped-wind-energy-project-bad-fit-for-monhegan/; “Some Monhegan Island Residents Ask Developers to Move Offshore Wind Project,” Maine Public Radio, November 1, 2016, https://www.mainepublic.org/maine/2016-11-01/some-monhegan-island-residents-ask-developers-to-move-offshore-wind-project#stream/0; and Tux Turkel, “Small group of Monhegan residents renews fight against offshore turbines,” Portland Press Herald, November 1, 2016, https://www.pressherald.com/2016/11/01/monhegan-residents-renew-fight-against-off-shore-turbines/ .

[29] Mili Mansarya, “As new KCI terminal nears completion, concessions and airport employers seek more workers,” Missouri Independent, January 31, 2023, https://missouriindependent.com/briefs/as-new-kci-terminal-nears-completion-concessions-and-airport-employers-seek-more-workers/; John Pepitone, “Concern about millions in “community benefits” within new KCI deal,” Fox 4, February 14, 2019, (Online). https://fox4kc.com/news/concern-about-millions-in-community-benefits-within-new-kci-deal/; Cat Reid, “FAA: Edgemoor, city can’t use airport revenue for $14M in community benefits,” KSHB 41, August 23 , 2018, https://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/faa-edgemoor-city-must-find-private-funding-for-14-m-in-community-benefits; Lisa Rodriguez, “Kansas City Airport Developer Faces Community-Improvement Funding Failure,” Kansas City Public Radio, August 23, 2018, https://www.kcur.org/government/2018-08-23/kansas-city-airport-developer-faces-community-improvement-funding-failure; “City Council reaches understanding with developer on new KCI terminal,” Build KCI, February 8 , 2018, https://www.buildkci.com/city-council-reaches-understanding-with-developer-on-new-kci-terminal/; Lisa Rodriguez, “Kansas City Voters Overwhelmingly Approve New Single Terminal At KCI,” Kansas City Public Radio, November 7 , 2017, https://www.kcur.org/politics-elections-and-government/2017-11-07/kansas-city-voters-overwhelmingly-approve-new-single-terminal-at-kci; Jeremy Hobson, “Kansas City Voters Approve New Airport By A Landslide,” WBUR Boston, November 8, 2017, https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/11/08/kansas-city-new-airport; and Jeremy Hobson, “Kansas City’s Airport: A Dud Or A Gem, Depending On Who You Ask,” WBUR Boston, October 26 , 2017, https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/10/26/kansas-city-airport.

[30] Emily Hamann, “Sacramento Employment and Training Agency receives $5 million grant for Aggie Square workforce development,” Sacramento Business Journal, August 10, 2023, https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2023/08/10/aggie-square-workforce-development-grant.html; Kate Gonzales, “Women of color are feeling the unbalanced burden of Sacramento’s rent crisis,” Sacramento Business Journal, August 16, 2023, https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2023/08/16/women-of-color-rent-crisis-burden.html; Tony Lopez, “Some community members concerned Aggie Square project will rise up housing costs,” CBS News Sacramento, February 9, 2023, https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/community-members-concerned-aggie-square-project-will-rise-up-housing-costs/; Natalie Hason, “California cities have millions for affordable housing. The difficulty is spending it,” Courthouse News Service, July 30, 2022, https://www.courthousenews.com/california-cities-have-millions-for-affordable-housing-the-difficulty-is-spending-it/; “Establishment of a Stockton Boulevard Housing Anti-Displacement Program,” City Council Report, City of Sacramento, California, December 14, 2021, https://sacramento.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=21&event_id=4200&meta_id=658263; “Term Sheet: Final Draft 4/14/2021 – for Sacramento City Council discussion and action on April 27, 2021,” City of Sacramento, California, April 27, 2021, https://www.cityofsacramento.org/-/media/Corporate/Files/CMO/4142021-SacIWD-Term-Sheet.pdf?la=en’; Edgar Sanchez, “Aggie Square,” N&R Publications, October 8, 2020, https://spotlight.newsreview.com/california-endowment/community/local-issues/aggie-square/; Antonio Harvey, “City Pact with UC Davis Could Net $60 million for affordable housing,” The Sacramento Observer, April 20, 2021, https://sacobserver.com/2021/04/city-pact-with-uc-davis-could-net-60m-for-affordable-housing/; Kris Hooks, “‘Most Significant Economic Development Project’ In Sacramento Moves Forward As City, Developers Agree On Community Benefits,” CapRadio, March 27, 2021, https://www.capradio.org/articles/2021/03/27/most-significant-economic-development-project-in-sacramento-moves-forward-as-city-developers-agree-on-community-benefits/; Chelsea Shannon, “UC Davis’ Aggie Square project faces litigation from Sacramento group,” ABC 10, January 4, 2021, https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/sacramento/uc-davis-aggie-square-lawsuit-sacramento/103-4b9e6470-5b6e-4c9e-99bc-ae023150a66a; Tanya Perez, “UC Davis Aggie Square Will Add Billions to Sacramento Region,” Press Release, UC Davis, July 7, 2020, https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/uc-davis-aggie-square-will-add-billions-sacramento-region; and David Westcott, “Aggie Square Launch Headquarters Opens,” Press Release, UC Davis, October 30, 2019, https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/aggie-square-launch-headquarters-opens.

[31] Hailea Schultz, “New Report Shows the Ion District’s Investment into Houston’s Innovation Ecosystem, Future Plans,” Greater Houston Partnership, May 5, 2023, https://www.houston.org/news/new-report-shows-ion-districts-investment-houstons-innovation-ecosystem-future-plans; Laura F. Mericas, “Growing Houston innovation hub announces new workforce partnership,” Houston Innovation Map, May 3, 2023, https://houston.innovationmap.com/ion-district-per-scholas-2659946239.html; “Ion District and Ion Share Update on Efforts to Expand Economic Opportunity in Houston,” Ion District, May 1, 2023, https://iondistrict.com/ion-district-and-ion-share-update-on-efforts-to-expand-economic-opportunity-in-houston/; “Rice Management Company’s Ion District finalizes first-of-its-kind agreement with City of Houston,” PR Newsire, November 21, 2021, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rice-management-companys-ion-district-finalizes-first-of-its-kind-agreement-with-city-of-houston-301421566.html; Chris Mathews, “City Council OKs $15.3M community benefits agreement for Ion District, despite community pushback,” Houston Business Journal, November 10, 2021, https://www.bizjournals.com/houston/news/2021/11/10/city-council-pass-ion-community-benefits-agreement.html; “PLN – Ion District Community Benefits Agreement,” City of Houston, November 9, 2021, https://houston.novusagenda.com/agendapublic//CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=24378&MeetingID=519; and Dylan McGuinness, “Advocates say Rice, city are leaving community out of Ion ‘community benefits agreement’” Houston Chronicle, November 2, 2021 https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Advocates-say-Rice-city-are-leaving-community-16586697.php;

[32] Ned Oliver and Karri Peifer, “Richmond casino referendum draws record campaign cash,” Axios, September 19, 2023, https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2023/09/19/richmond-casino-referendum-record-cash; Kate Andrews, “Richmond City Council passes casino legislation — again,” Virginia Business, June 12, 2023, https://www.virginiabusiness.com/article/richmond-city-council-passes-casino-legislation/; Kate Andrews, “Richmond casino rejected by voters: Urban One Inc., city mayor acknowledge referendum’s defeat,” Virginia Business, November 2, 2021, https://www.virginiabusiness.com/article/too-close-to-call-but-richmond-casino-appears-unlikely/’; and Justin Moyer, “A Black-owned casino bets on a Black neighborhood in the former capital of the Confederacy,” The Washington Post, August 20, 2022, https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/black-casino-richmond-alfred-liggins/2021/08/20/fff68248-f93e-11eb-b8dd-0e376fba55f2_story.html.

[33] City of Detroit, “District Detroit CBO Agreement – Approved 3.28.23,” City of Detroit, Michigan, 2023 https://detroitmi.gov/sites/detroitmi.localhost/files/2023-05/District%20Detroit%20-%20CBO%20Provision%20Agreement_FINAL_Executed_03.28.23.pdf; City of Detroit, “District Detroit CBA Fact Sheet,” City of Detroit, Michigan, 2023. https://detroitmi.gov/media/71216; “Related Companies and Olympia Development share vision for future development in The District Detroit,” Press Release, Related Companies, 2022, https://www.related.com/press-releases/2022-05-26/related-companies-and-olympia-development-share-vision-future-development; “Editorial: Detroiters have little choice in Ilitch project ― and it feels like deja vu,” Detroit Free Press, March 17, 2023, https://www.freep.com/story/opinion/editorials/2023/03/17/ilitch-arena-little-caesars-district-detroit-abatements/69986713007/; and Candice Williams, “Developers detail $1.5B District Detroit mixed-use plan,” Detroit News, November 29, 2022, https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2022/11/30/olympia-development-related-companies-detail-district-detroit-project/69685148007/.

[34] “Nature Energy Roberts Conditional Use Permit and Variance Applications,” Nature Energy, March 3, 2022, https://robertswisconsin.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Nature-Energy-Meeting-Handout.pdf; “Nature Energy Biogas Facility Roberts, Wisconsin Response to Comments,” Nature Energy, August 4, 2022, https://robertswisconsin.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/NE-Roberts_Public-Hearing-Comment-Responses-FINAL-8.26.22.pdf; “Withdrawal Letter,” Nature Energy, October 7, 2022, https://robertswisconsin.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022-10-07-Roberts-Withdrawal-Letter-as-submitted.pdf; Tom Lindfors, “Nature Energy withdraws application, digester projects go 0 for 3 in St. Croix County,” Hudson Star-Observer, November 8, 2022, https://www.hudsonstarobserver.com/news/nature-energy-withdraws-application-digester-projects-go-0-for-3-in-st-croix-county/article_1d18e118-5f87-11ed-a9d9-1b31d37d3144.html; Mike Longaekcer, “Project to turn turkey litter into natural gas delayed after neighbors object,” Pioneer Press, April 30, 2019, https://www.twincities.com/2019/04/30/project-to-turn-turkey-litter-into-natural-gas-delayed-after-neighbors-object/; Emeral Clean Water 4 All, “Roberts, WI biogas digester proposal – info on St. Croix County’s unique landscape,” YouTube, March 24, 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4ix5QYEaPg; Jeff Beach, “Nature Energy brings large-scale manure-to-energy projects from Denmark to Minnesota,” West Central Tribune, November 15, 2022, https://www.wctrib.com/business/nature-energy-brings-large-scale-manure-to-energy-projects-from-denmark-to-minnesota; and Kirsti Marohn, “Digesters make renewable energy from manure, but face hurdles,” Minnesota Public Radio, September 12, 2023 https://www.mprnews.org/story/2023/09/12/digesters-make-renewable-energy-from-manure-but-face-hurdles.

[35] Gretchen Morgenson et al., “’Our horses are ready’: Native Americans and white farmers form an unlikely alliance to oppose a pipeline in the Dakotas,” NBC News, October 25, 2022, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/native-americans-white-farmers-join-forces-oppose-summit-carbon-captur-rcna52523; Siri Hedreen, “Summit Carbon CEO undeterred by folding of fellow CO2 pipeline project,” S&P Global, October 30, 2023, https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/summit-carbon-ceo-undeterred-by-folding-of-fellow-co2-pipeline-project-78096880; Joshua Haiar, “‘It’s about property rights’: Some farmers resent ethanol industry’s push for carbon pipelines,” Nebraska Examiner, May 8, 2023, https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2023/05/08/its-about-property-rights-some-farmers-resent-ethanol-industrys-push-for-carbon-pipelines/; Ariel Wittenberg, “Strange Bedfellows: Farmers and Big Greens square off against Biden and the GOP,” Politico, May 29, 2022, https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/29/iowa-manchin-carbon-capture-pipeline-00030361; Leah Douglas, “North Dakota regulator rejects Summit Carbon Solutions carbon pipeline application,” Reuters, August 4, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/north-dakota-regulator-rejects-summit-carbon-solutions-carbon-pipeline-2023-08-04/; Mike Soraghan, “Can a CO2 pipeline developer change how farmers are treated?” E&E News, August 14, 2023, https://www.eenews.net/articles/can-a-co2-pipeline-developer-change-how-farmers-are-treated/; Jack Dura, “North Dakota panel will reconsider denying permit for Summit CO2 pipeline,” ABC News, September 15, 2023, https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/north-dakota-panel-reconsider-denying-permit-summit-co2-103239034; Joshua Haiar, “State denies Summit permit; both carbon pipelines proposed in SD now rejected,” Minnesota Reformer, September 11, 2023, https://minnesotareformer.com/2023/09/11/state-denies-summit-permit-both-carbon-pipelines-proposed-in-sd-now-rejected/.

Copyrights and Citation
Hadia Sheerazi, Gareth Westler, Chathurika Gamage, Moana McClellan, and Patience Bukirwa, Delivering Equitable and Meaningful Community Benefits via Clean Hydrogen Hubs: Case studies and best practices from advising developers of the DOE’s $7 billion Regional Clean H2Hubs program, plus lessons for future clean energy projects, RMI, January 28, 2024, https://rmi.org/delivering-equitable-and-meaningful-community-benefits-via-clean-hydrogen-hubs.

RMI values collaboration and aims to accelerate the energy transition by sharing knowledge and insights. We therefore allow interested parties to reference, share, and cite our work through the Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0 license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

All images used are from iStock.com unless otherwise noted.

Donor Acknowledgement
RMI would like to thank the Bezos Earth Fund (Earth Fund), Mission Possible Partnership (MPP), and Breakthrough Energy (BE) for their partnership on this critical work. We are grateful for support of our ongoing efforts to accelerate equitable global decarbonization for a just, clean energy transition for all. The findings of this report reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the supporting organizations.